The affordability crisis in America is touching nearly everything, from groceries to housing to childcare. It is shaping voter attitudes and building real momentum for policymakers looking to act and win their midterm elections. As a result, there has been a growing shift among Republicans and Democrats to focus their attention on industries where Americans have been feeling cost increases. Voters are speaking out on this: 70 percent say raising children has become too expensive, up 13 points from 2024, and 58 percent of parents with kids in sports say paying for equipment and fees has become a financial strain. Which raises the question: will the cost of youth sports be the next industry policymakers take a shot at?
So far, it looks like the answer is yes, and Washington isn’t just taking practice shots. Late last year, the House Education and Workforce subcommittee examined the growing role of private capital in youth athletics. That early scrutiny has since fed a steady stream of earned media coverage, as reporters and advocates look for someone to hold responsible for rising costs. To be clear, this is not fundamentally a private equity problem. It is a broader story about private capital of all kinds stepping into a space that public funding and community programs have increasingly pulled back from, accompanied by the nostalgia and emotional ties to activities so many of us remember fondly. Leaving me wondering if private equity is just a convenient villain in a more complicated dynamic.
This spring debate returned to Capitol Hill with newly introduced Democrat-led bicameral legislation and a second, sharper House hearing that drew pointed bipartisan concerns from committee members. The legislation and recent activity have generated plenty of headlines, but as Bloomberg Government pointed out the other week, policymakers are split on whether to support it, and odds are low that this legislation will get legs anytime soon. However, this is beside the point. The bigger issue is continued headline risk.
Leaving the bigger question to be: are you and your organization ready with your own playbook? The players and critics participating in the game (debate) are sophisticated in how to drive media cycles, heighten the emotional narrative, and are closely tied to a variety of stakeholders in academia, advocacy and federal, state and local policymakers. They can very easily set the narrative and call the shots if you aren’t developing a playbook of your own to win the game and own the narrative.
With that in mind, here are five key considerations as your organization prepares for a new playing field.
1. Know the Players and Their Tactics
For key or emerging issues, have you assessed the stakeholders engaging on the issue and begun mapping their positions, messages, and activities? Stakeholder mapping helps your organization understand motivations, relationships, and communications strategies so you can build a proactive and reactive plan, rather than reacting to whoever is loudest.
2. Assess and Refine Your Messaging Playbook Now
When did your organization last pressure-test corporate or issue-specific messaging? Is it calibrated to the shifting political or media landscape? Now is the time to test how your messages hold up, where they’re weak, and what added proof points would move or neutralize a skeptical audience.
3. Be Specific and Consider if Business Initiatives are Needed
On an issue like affordability, policymakers, media, and voters want to see real action, not just messaging. Words alone will not meet the moment. This could mean considering new stakeholder partnerships, a long-term business commitment/initiative, or creating an advisory board to proactively define your organization’s story and reputation.
4. Determine Messaging Lanes for Corporate and Broader Industry Voices
As many of us know, identifying the right voice to carry a message is essential to communicating authentically. Matching messages to the best messenger early on can help with preparedness and surface any gaps to be solved through relationship building, message alignment, or a cohesive strategy before news breaks or policymaking begins in earnest.
5. Shape the Debate Now, Before the Post-Midterms Scramble
Companies and industries that spend this window of opportunity getting “their house in order,” defining their own story and identifying what action can make a meaningful impact will be in a fundamentally different position than those waiting for the midterm election results. Quiet periods are exactly when groundwork and playmaking happen.
Hope isn't a strategy. Preparation is. Don't wait for the next hearing, headline, or legislative proposal to define your story. If your organization is assessing emerging reputation or policy risks, Narrative can help you map stakeholders, pressure-test messaging, and develop a proactive strategy that keeps you ahead of the debate.
|
Samantha Martin is a Managing Director at Narrative, with over a decade of experience in advocacy and public affairs campaigns. She brings deep expertise to our financial services clients, delivering strategic solutions to complex public policy challenges. To continue the conversation, please reach out to Samantha at smartin@narrativestrategies.com. |